You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing of Phytoene desaturase in Cassava
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2017.01780 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Odipio, Titus Alicai, Ivan Ingelbrecht, Dmitri A. Nusinow, Rebecca Bart, Nigel J. Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| Colombia | 1 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 174 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 15% |
| Researcher | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 51 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 57 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,625,545
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,140
of 24,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,656
of 339,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#24
of 484 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 484 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.