↓ Skip to main content

Genotypic Variation in Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus) Under Contrasting N Supply in Pot and Field Experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genotypic Variation in Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus) Under Contrasting N Supply in Pot and Field Experiments
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01825
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huiying He, Rui Yang, Yajun Li, Aisheng Ma, Lanqin Cao, Xiaoming Wu, Biyun Chen, Hui Tian, Yajun Gao

Abstract

Oilseed rape (Brassica napus) characteristically has high N uptake efficiency and low N utilization efficiency (NUtE, seed yield/shoot N accumulation). Determining the NUtE phenotype of various genotypes in different growth conditions is a way of finding target traits to improve oilseed rape NUtE. The aim of this study was to compare oilseed rape genotypes grown on contrasting N supply rates in pot and field experiments to investigate the genotypic variations of NUtE and to identify indicators of N efficient genotypes. For 50 oilseed rape genotypes, NUtE, dry matter and N partitioning, morphological characteristics, and the yield components were investigated under high and low N supplies in a greenhouse pot experiment and a field trial. Although the genotype rankings of NUtE were different between the pot experiment and the field trial, some genotypes performed consistently in both two environments. N-responder, N-nonresponder, N-efficient and N-inefficient genotypes were identified from these genotypes with consistent NUtE. The correlations between the pot experiment and the field trial in NUtE were only 0.34 at high N supplies and no significant correlations were found at low N supplies. However, Pearson coefficient correlation (r) and principal component analysis showed NUtE had similar genetic correlations with other traits across the pot and field experiment. Among the yield components, only seeds per silique showed strong and positive correlations with NUtE under varying N supply in both experiments (r = 0.47(**); 0.49(**); 0.47(**); 0.54(**)). At high and low N supply, NUtE was positively correlated with seed yield (r = 0.45(**); 0.53(**); 0.39(**); 0.87(**)), nitrogen harvest index (NHI, r = 0.68(**); 0.82(**); 0.99(**); 0.89(**)), and harvest index (HI, r = 0.79(**); 0.83(**); 0.90(**); 0.78(**)) and negatively correlated with biomass distribution to stem and leaf (r = -0.34(**); -0.45(**); -0.37(**); 0.62(**)), all aboveground plant section N concentration (r from -0.30(*) to -0.80(**)), N distribution to the vegetative parts (silique husk, stem and leaf) (r from -0.40(**) to -0.83(**)). N-efficient (N-responder) genotypes produced more seeds per silique and had significantly higher NHI and HI than did N-inefficient (N-nonresponder) genotypes. In conclusion, across the pot and field experiments, the 50 genotypes had similar underlying traits correlated with NUtE and seeds per silique may be a good indicator of NUtE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,452,930
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16,393
of 20,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,211
of 328,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#406
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,507 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.