↓ Skip to main content

Genome-Wide Association Mapping of Flowering and Ripening Periods in Apple

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-Wide Association Mapping of Flowering and Ripening Periods in Apple
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01923
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorge Urrestarazu, Hélène Muranty, Caroline Denancé, Diane Leforestier, Elisa Ravon, Arnaud Guyader, Rémi Guisnel, Laurence Feugey, Sébastien Aubourg, Jean-Marc Celton, Nicolas Daccord, Luca Dondini, Roberto Gregori, Marc Lateur, Patrick Houben, Matthew Ordidge, Frantisek Paprstein, Jiri Sedlak, Hilde Nybom, Larisa Garkava-Gustavsson, Michela Troggio, Luca Bianco, Riccardo Velasco, Charles Poncet, Anthony Théron, Shigeki Moriya, Marco C. A. M. Bink, François Laurens, Stefano Tartarini, Charles-Eric Durel

Abstract

Deciphering the genetic control of flowering and ripening periods in apple is essential for breeding cultivars adapted to their growing environments. We implemented a large Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) at the European level using an association panel of 1,168 different apple genotypes distributed over six locations and phenotyped for these phenological traits. The panel was genotyped at a high-density of SNPs using the Axiom®Apple 480 K SNP array. We ran GWAS with a multi-locus mixed model (MLMM), which handles the putatively confounding effect of significant SNPs elsewhere on the genome. Genomic regions were further investigated to reveal candidate genes responsible for the phenotypic variation. At the whole population level, GWAS retained two SNPs as cofactors on chromosome 9 for flowering period, and six for ripening period (four on chromosome 3, one on chromosome 10 and one on chromosome 16) which, together accounted for 8.9 and 17.2% of the phenotypic variance, respectively. For both traits, SNPs in weak linkage disequilibrium were detected nearby, thus suggesting the existence of allelic heterogeneity. The geographic origins and relationships of apple cultivars accounted for large parts of the phenotypic variation. Variation in genotypic frequency of the SNPs associated with the two traits was connected to the geographic origin of the genotypes (grouped as North+East, West and South Europe), and indicated differential selection in different growing environments. Genes encoding transcription factors containing either NAC or MADS domains were identified as major candidates within the small confidence intervals computed for the associated genomic regions. A strong microsynteny between apple and peach was revealed in all the four confidence interval regions. This study shows how association genetics can unravel the genetic control of important horticultural traits in apple, as well as reduce the confidence intervals of the associated regions identified by linkage mapping approaches. Our findings can be used for the improvement of apple through marker-assisted breeding strategies that take advantage of the accumulating additive effects of the identified SNPs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 40 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,632,565
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,830
of 20,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,950
of 328,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#81
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,507 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.