↓ Skip to main content

A Review of Biotechnological Artemisinin Production in Plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Review of Biotechnological Artemisinin Production in Plants
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2017.01966
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nur K. B. K. Ikram, Henrik T. Simonsen

Abstract

Malaria is still an eminent threat to major parts of the world population mainly in sub-Saharan Africa. Researchers around the world continuously seek novel solutions to either eliminate or treat the disease. Artemisinin, isolated from the Chinese medicinal herb Artemisia annua, is the active ingredient in artemisinin-based combination therapies used to treat the disease. However, naturally artemisinin is produced in small quantities, which leads to a shortage of global supply. Due to its complex structure, it is difficult chemically synthesize. Thus to date, A. annua remains as the main commercial source of artemisinin. Current advances in genetic and metabolic engineering drives to more diverse approaches and developments on improving in planta production of artemisinin, both in A. annua and in other plants. In this review, we describe efforts in bioengineering to obtain a higher production of artemisinin in A. annua and stable heterologous in planta systems. The current progress and advancements provides hope for significantly improved production in plants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 215 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 16%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Other 11 5%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 71 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 15%
Chemistry 16 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 80 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,094,893
of 23,981,321 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,544
of 22,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,605
of 328,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#43
of 434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,981,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,334 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.