You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differentiation of Three Centella Species in Australia as Inferred from Morphological Characteristics, ISSR Molecular Fingerprinting and Phytochemical Composition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2017.01980 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ali Alqahtani, Jun-Lae Cho, Ka Ho Wong, Kong M. Li, Valentina Razmovski-Naumovski, George Q. Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,361,158
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,239
of 24,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,814
of 447,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#135
of 432 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,900 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 432 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.