↓ Skip to main content

Peroxisomal Targeting as a Sensitive Tool to Detect Protein-Small RNA Interactions through in Vivo Piggybacking

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peroxisomal Targeting as a Sensitive Tool to Detect Protein-Small RNA Interactions through in Vivo Piggybacking
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Incarbone, Christophe Ritzenthaler, Patrice Dunoyer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16,871
of 24,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#352,903
of 457,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#355
of 439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.