You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Roles of E3 Ubiquitin-Ligases in Nuclear Protein Homeostasis during Plant Stress Responses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.00139 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irene Serrano, Laura Campos, Susana Rivas |
| Abstract |
Ubiquitination, the reversible protein conjugation with ubiquitin (Ub), is a post-translational modification that enables rapid and specific cellular responses to stimuli without requirement ofde novoprotein synthesis. Although ubiquitination also displays non-proteolytic functions, it often acts as a signal for selective protein degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). In plants, it has become increasingly apparent that the UPS is a central regulator of many key cellular and physiological processes, including responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. In the nucleus, protein regulationviathe UPS orchestrates gene expression, genome maintenance, and signal transduction. Here, we focus on E3 Ub-ligase proteins as major components of the ubiquitination cascade that confer specificity of substrate recognition. We provide an overview on how they contribute to nuclear proteome plasticity during plant responses to environmental stress signals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 24% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,495,840
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#11,036
of 20,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,533
of 439,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#281
of 439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,564 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.