↓ Skip to main content

How Does Silicon Mediate Plant Water Uptake and Loss Under Water Deficiency?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Does Silicon Mediate Plant Water Uptake and Loss Under Water Deficiency?
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00281
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daoqian Chen, Shiwen Wang, Lina Yin, Xiping Deng

Abstract

In plants, water deficiency can result from a deficit of water from the soil, an obstacle to the uptake of water or the excess water loss; in these cases, the similar consequence is the limitation of plant growth and crop yield. Silicon (Si) has been widely reported to alleviate the plant water status and water balance under variant stress conditions in both monocot and dicot plants, especially under drought and salt stresses. However, the underlying mechanism is unclear. In addition to the regulation of leaf transpiration, recently, Si application was found to be involved in the adjustment of root hydraulic conductance by up-regulating aquaporin gene expression and concentrating K in the xylem sap. Therefore, this review discusses the potential effects of Si on both leaf transpiration and root water absorption, especially focusing on how Si modulates the root hydraulic conductance. A growing number of studies support the conclusion that Si application improves plant water status by increasing root water uptake, rather than by decreasing their water loss under conditions of water deficiency. The enhancement of plant water uptake by Si is achievable through the activation of osmotic adjustment, improving aquaporin activity and increasing the root/shoot ratio. The underlying mechanisms of the Si on improving plant water uptake under water deficiency conditions are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 159 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Student > Master 23 14%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 50 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 47%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Chemical Engineering 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 60 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,900,259
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,095
of 21,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,018
of 332,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#93
of 474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.