↓ Skip to main content

Abscisic Acid and Gibberellins Antagonistically Mediate Plant Development and Abiotic Stress Responses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Abscisic Acid and Gibberellins Antagonistically Mediate Plant Development and Abiotic Stress Responses
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00416
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Shu, Wenguan Zhou, Feng Chen, Xiaofeng Luo, Wenyu Yang

Abstract

Phytohormones regulate numerous important biological processes in plant development and biotic/abiotic stress response cascades. More than 50 and 100 years have passed since the initial discoveries of the phytohormones abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellins (GA), respectively. Over the past several decades, numerous elegant studies have demonstrated that ABA and GA antagonistically regulate many plant developmental processes, including seed maturation, seed dormancy and germination, root initiation, hypocotyl and stem elongation, and floral transition. Furthermore, as a well-established stress hormone, ABA plays a key role in plant responses to abiotic stresses, such as drought, flooding, salinity and low temperature. Interestingly, recent evidence revealed that GA are also involved in plant response to adverse environmental conditions. Consequently, the complex crosstalk networks between ABA and GA, mediated by diverse key regulators, have been extensively investigated and documented. In this updated mini-review, we summarize the most recent advances in our understanding of the antagonistically regulatory roles of ABA and GA in different stages of plant development and in various plant-environment interactions, focusing on the crosstalk between ABA and GA at the levels of phytohormone metabolism and signal transduction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 207 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 74 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 17%
Environmental Science 8 4%
Chemistry 4 2%
Engineering 2 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 77 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#6,392,102
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,495
of 21,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,470
of 331,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#106
of 454 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 454 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.