↓ Skip to main content

Rapid Generation of Barley Mutant Lines With High Nitrogen Uptake Efficiency by Microspore Mutagenesis and Field Screening

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid Generation of Barley Mutant Lines With High Nitrogen Uptake Efficiency by Microspore Mutagenesis and Field Screening
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00450
Pubmed ID
Authors

Runhong Gao, Guimei Guo, Chunyan Fang, Saihua Huang, Jianmin Chen, Ruiju Lu, Jianhua Huang, Xiaorong Fan, Chenghong Liu

Abstract

In vitro mutagenesis via isolated microspore culture provides an efficient way to produce numerous double haploid (DH) lines with mutation introduction and homozygosity stabilization, which can be used for screening directly. In this study, 356 DH lines were produced from the malt barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivar Hua-30 via microspore mutagenic treatment with ethyl methane sulfonate or pingyangmycin during in vitro culture. The lines were subjected to field screening under high nitrogen (HN) and low nitrogen (LN) conditions, and the number of productive tillers was used as the main screening index. Five mutant lines (A1-28, A1-84, A1-226, A16-11, and A9-29) with high numbers of productive tillers were obtained over three consecutive years of screening. In the fifth year, components related to N-use efficiency (NUE), including N accumulation, utilization, and translocation, were characterized for these lines based on N uptake efficiency (NUpE), N utilization efficiency (NUtE), and N translocation efficiency (NTE). The results show that the NUpE of four mutant lines (A1-84, A1-226, A9-29, and A16-11) improved significantly under HN, whereas that of two lines (A1-84 and A9-29) improved under LN. As a result, their NUE improved greatly. No improvement in NUtE was observed in any of the five mutant lines. A1-84 and A9-29 were selected as an enhanced genotype in N uptake, and A1-28 showed improved NTE at the grain-filling stage. Our results imply that high-NUpE mutants can be produced through microspore mutagenesis and field screening, and that improvement of NUE in barley depends on enhancement of N uptake.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Unknown 9 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 35%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unknown 9 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,982,922
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,445
of 20,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,086
of 329,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#248
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,616 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.