↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Different Hyperspectral Variables for Diagnosing Leaf Nitrogen Accumulation in Wheat

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of Different Hyperspectral Variables for Diagnosing Leaf Nitrogen Accumulation in Wheat
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00674
Pubmed ID
Authors

Changwei Tan, Ying Du, Jian Zhou, Dunliang Wang, Ming Luo, Yongjian Zhang, Wenshan Guo

Abstract

Hyperspectral remote sensing is a rapid non-destructive method for diagnosing nitrogen status in wheat crops. In this study, a quantitative correlation was associated with following parameters: leaf nitrogen accumulation (LNA), raw hyperspectral reflectance, first-order differential hyperspectra, and hyperspectral characteristics of wheat. In this study, integrated linear regression of LNA was obtained with raw hyperspectral reflectance (measurement wavelength = 790.4 nm). Furthermore, an exponential regression of LNA was obtained with first-order differential hyperspectra (measurement wavelength = 831.7 nm). Coefficients (R2) were 0.813 and 0.847; root mean squared errors (RMSE) were 2.02 g·m-2 and 1.72 g·m-2; and relative errors (RE) were 25.97% and 20.85%, respectively. Both the techniques were considered as optimal in the diagnoses of wheat LNA. Nevertheless, the better one was the new normalized variable (SD r - SD b )/(SD r + SD b ), which was based on vegetation indices of R2 = 0.935, RMSE = 0.98, and RE = 11.25%. In addition, (SD r - SD b )/(SD r + SD b ) was reliable in the application of a different cultivar or even wheat grown elsewhere. This indicated a superior fit and better performance for (SD r - SD b )/(SD r + SD b ). For diagnosing LNA in wheat, the newly normalized variable (SD r - SD b )/(SD r + SD b ) was more effective than the previously reported data of raw hyperspectral reflectance, first-order differential hyperspectra, and red-edge parameters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 32%
Engineering 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#17,981,442
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#12,265
of 20,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,934
of 330,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#311
of 464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,707 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.