↓ Skip to main content

Rational Application of Fertilizer Nitrogen to Soil in Combination With Foliar Zn Spraying Improved Zn Nutritional Quality of Wheat Grains

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rational Application of Fertilizer Nitrogen to Soil in Combination With Foliar Zn Spraying Improved Zn Nutritional Quality of Wheat Grains
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00677
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haiyong Xia, Yanfang Xue, Dunyi Liu, Weilin Kong, Yanhui Xue, Yanyan Tang, Jin Li, Dong Li, Peipei Mei

Abstract

To alleviate human zinc (Zn) deficiency, it is worthy to develop rational agronomic managements to achieve high yielding and high resource-use efficiency wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains biofortified with Zn. Effects of application of three rates of nitrogen (N) fertilizer (75,200 and 275 kg·ha-1) to soil in combination with three foliar applications (deionized water, Zn alone, and a combination of Zn and sucrose) on grain yield, yield components, grain Zn concentration, protein, phytic acid (PA), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), and carbon (C), as well as on Zn bioavailability, were investigated in four wheat cultivars ("Jinan 17," "Jimai 20," "Jimai 22," and "Luyuan 502") under field conditions. Enhanced N increased Zn and protein concentrations as well as bioavailability; excessive N input did not result in further improvements. Zinc spraying was more effective than soil fertilizer N application, the spray of Zn (with or without sucrose) increased grain Zn concentrations by 11.1-15.6 mg·kg-1 (27.1-38.1%), and increased grain Zn bioavailability, estimated using total daily absorbed Zn (TAZ) and molar ratios of PA/Zn) and PA × Ca/Zn, by 0.4-0.6 mg d-1 (28.6-42.9%), 23.1-27.4% and 24.0-28.0%, respectively. Remarkably, increases caused by 'Zn + sucrose' were higher than spraying Zn alone. Grain Zn bioavailability was more sensitive to the selection of cultivar than Zn concentrations. Among cultivars, the higher the grain yields and concentrations of antinutritional compounds, the lower the grain Zn nutritional quality would be. 200 kg N ha-1 application rate in combination with foliar spraying of "Zn + sucrose" maximized grain Zn concentrations of "Jinan 17," "Jimai 20," "Jimai 22," and "Luyuan 502" to be 59.4, 56.9, 55.8, and 60.9 mg kg-1, respectively, achieving the target value for biofortification. Additionally, PA/Zn and PA × Ca/Zn of "Jinan 17," "Jimai 20," and "Luyuan 502" were <15 and 200, and TAZ was maximized to be 2.2, 2.0, and 2.1 mg d-1, respectively, indicating higher bioavailability. Therefore, optimal soil N and foliar Zn management together with suitable cultivars maintained high grain yield with lower N input and could substantially increase grain Zn nutritional quality simultaneously.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 16 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 37%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 16 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,520,426
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16,565
of 20,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,018
of 330,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#405
of 464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,698 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.