You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cross Regulatory Network Between Circadian Clock and Leaf Senescence Is Emerging in Higher Plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.00700 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yan Wang, Yuanyuan Zhang, Lei Wang |
| Abstract |
Circadian clock and senescence have been shown to tightly intertwined with each other in numerous eukaryotes, but the regulation of circadian oscillator on triggering leaf senescence, and vice versa, remains largely unknown in higher plants. Very recently, circadian system and leaf senescence were found to be highly interconnected in higher plants. Circadian clock was shown to regulate leaf senescence through a few cross signaling pathways including age-dependent, plant hormone mediated, and dark induced manners to trigger the onset of leaf senescence. By contrast, circadian clock itself also can be affected by the leaves senescing process. The eventually delineating cross networks between circadian clock and leaf senescence will lay the foundation for understanding the fitness of developmental dynamics of plants with aging. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 29% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 29% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,005,966
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,436
of 20,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,022
of 330,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#241
of 464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,687 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.