You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diversity of Drought Tolerance in the Genus Vigna
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.00729 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kohtaro Iseki, Yu Takahashi, Chiaki Muto, Ken Naito, Norihiko Tomooka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,574,799
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,899
of 20,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,522
of 328,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#139
of 479 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,728 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 479 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.