↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci for Clubroot Resistance in Brassica oleracea With the Use of Brassica SNP Microarray

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci for Clubroot Resistance in Brassica oleracea With the Use of Brassica SNP Microarray
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00822
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisha Peng, Lili Zhou, Qinfei Li, Dayong Wei, Xuesong Ren, Hongyuan Song, Jiaqin Mei, Jun Si, Wei Qian

Abstract

Increasing clubroot resistance (CR) of Brassica oleracea by ascertaining the molecular mechanisms has been the key focus in modern B. oleracea breeding. In order to identify the quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with CR in B. oleracea, 94 F2 vegetative lines which were developed by tissue culture of selfed seeds from the F1 generation between a clubroot-resistant B. oleracea inbred line and a susceptible line, were identified for disease incidence and six CR-associated traits under a lab inoculation by Plasmodiophora brassicae and were genotyped with the 60K Brassica SNP array. Significant correlations were detected for numbers of fibrous roots and P. brassicae content in roots with disease incidence. Nine linkage groups were constructed from 565 bins which covered around 3,000 SNPs, spanning 1,028 cM of the B. oleracea genome with an average distance of 1.82 cM between adjacent bins. A total of 23 QTLs were identified for disease incidence and the other two correlated traits, individually explaining 6.1-17.8% of the phenotypic variation. Several overlaps were detected among traits, including one three-traits-overlapped locus on linkage group C08 and two important overlapped regions between the two CR-associated traits on C06. The QTLs were compared with known CR loci/genes and the novelty of our QTLs was discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Unspecified 1 4%
Librarian 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#14,134,028
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#7,399
of 20,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,594
of 328,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#196
of 469 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,707 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 469 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.