↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Architecture of Nitrogen-Deficiency Tolerance in Wheat Seedlings Based on a Nested Association Mapping (NAM) Population

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Architecture of Nitrogen-Deficiency Tolerance in Wheat Seedlings Based on a Nested Association Mapping (NAM) Population
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00845
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deqiang Ren, Xiaojian Fang, Peng Jiang, Guangxu Zhang, Junmei Hu, Xiaoqian Wang, Qing Meng, Weian Cui, Shengjie Lan, Xin Ma, Hongwei Wang, Lingrang Kong

Abstract

Genetic divergence for nitrogen utilization in germplasms is important in wheat breeding programs, especially for low nitrogen input management. In this study, a nested association mapping (NAM) population, derived from "Yanzhan 1" (a Chinese domesticated cultivar) crossed with "Hussar" (a British domesticated cultivar) and another three semi-wild wheat varieties, namely, "Cayazheda 29" (Triticum aestivum ssp. tibetanum Shao), "Yunnan" (T. aestivum ssp. yunnanense King), and "Yutian" (T. aestivum petropavloski Udats et Migusch), was used to detect quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for nitrogen utilization at the seedling stage. An integrated genetic map was constructed using 2,059 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers from a 90 K SNP chip, with a total coverage of 2,355.75 cM and an average marker spacing of 1.13 cM. A total of 67 QTLs for RDW (root dry weight), SDW (shoot dry weight), TDW (total dry weight), and RSDW (root to shoot ratio) were identified under normal nitrogen conditions (N+) and nitrogen deficient conditions (N-). Twenty-three of these QTLs were only detected under N- conditions. Moreover, 23 favorable QTLs were identified in the domesticated cultivar Yanzhan 1, 15 of which were detected under N+ conditions, while only four were detected under N- conditions. In contrast, the semi-wild cultivars contributed more favorable N--specific QTLs (eight from Cayazheda 29; nine from Yunnan), which could be further explored for breeding cultivars adapted to nitrogen-deficient conditions. In particular, QRSDW-5A.1 from YN should be further evaluated using high-resolution mapping.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 8 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#11,540
of 21,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,480
of 330,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#285
of 474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.