You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Commentary: Directions for Optimization of Photosynthetic Carbon Fixation: RuBisCO's Efficiency May Not Be So Constrained After All
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.00929 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume G. Tcherkez, Camille Bathellier, Graham D. Farquhar, George H. Lorimer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,015,838
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,439
of 20,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,867
of 329,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#241
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,724 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.