↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the Impact of Spatial Resolution on the Estimation of Leaf Nitrogen Concentration Over the Full Season of Paddy Rice Using Near-Surface Imaging Spectroscopy Data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the Impact of Spatial Resolution on the Estimation of Leaf Nitrogen Concentration Over the Full Season of Paddy Rice Using Near-Surface Imaging Spectroscopy Data
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00964
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Zhou, Tao Cheng, Yan Zhu, Weixing Cao, Susan L. Ustin, Hengbiao Zheng, Xia Yao, Yongchao Tian

Abstract

Timely monitoring nitrogen status of rice crops with remote sensing can help us optimize nitrogen fertilizer management and reduce environmental pollution. Recently, the use of near-surface imaging spectroscopy is emerging as a promising technology that can collect hyperspectral images with spatial resolutions ranging from millimeters to decimeters. The spatial resolution is crucial for the efficiency in the image sampling across rice plants and the separation of leaf signals from the background. However, the optimal spatial resolution of such images for monitoring the leaf nitrogen concentration (LNC) in rice crops remains unclear. To assess the impact of spatial resolution on the estimation of rice LNC, we collected ground-based hyperspectral images throughout the entire growing season over 2 consecutive years and generated ten sets of images with spatial resolutions ranging from 1.3 to 450 mm. These images were used to determine the sensitivity of LNC prediction to spatial resolution with three groups of vegetation indices (VIs) and two multivariate methods Gaussian Process regression (GPR) and Partial least squares regression (PLSR). The reflectance spectra of sunlit-, shaded-, and all-leaf leaf pixels separated from background pixels at each spatial resolution were used to predict LNC with VIs, GPR and PLSR, respectively. The results demonstrated all-leaf pixels generally exhibited more stable performance than sunlit- and shaded-leaf pixels regardless of estimation approaches. The predictions of LNC required stage-specific LNC~VI models for each vegetative stage but could be performed with a single model for all the reproductive stages. Specifically, most VIs achieved stable performances from all the resolutions finer than 14 mm for the early tillering stage but from all the resolutions finer than 56 mm for the other stages. In contrast, the global models for the prediction of LNC across the entire growing season were successfully established with the approaches of GPR or PLSR. In particular, GPR generally exhibited the best prediction of LNC with the optimal spatial resolution being found at 28 mm. These findings represent significant advances in the application of ground-based imaging spectroscopy as a promising approach to crop monitoring and understanding the effects of spatial resolution on the estimation of rice LNC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 29 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 17%
Engineering 11 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 37 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,419,368
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#8,292
of 20,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,979
of 327,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#222
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,707 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.