↓ Skip to main content

CRISPR for Crop Improvement: An Update Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
460 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
944 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CRISPR for Crop Improvement: An Update Review
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.00985
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deepa Jaganathan, Karthikeyan Ramasamy, Gothandapani Sellamuthu, Shilpha Jayabalan, Gayatri Venkataraman

Abstract

The availability of genome sequences for several crops and advances in genome editing approaches has opened up possibilities to breed for almost any given desirable trait. Advancements in genome editing technologies such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) has made it possible for molecular biologists to more precisely target any gene of interest. However, these methodologies are expensive and time-consuming as they involve complicated steps that require protein engineering. Unlike first-generation genome editing tools, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing involves simple designing and cloning methods, with the same Cas9 being potentially available for use with different guide RNAs targeting multiple sites in the genome. After proof-of-concept demonstrations in crop plants involving the primary CRISPR-Cas9 module, several modified Cas9 cassettes have been utilized in crop plants for improving target specificity and reducing off-target cleavage (e.g., Nmcas9, Sacas9, and Stcas9). Further, the availability of Cas9 enzymes from additional bacterial species has made available options to enhance specificity and efficiency of gene editing methodologies. This review summarizes the options available to plant biotechnologists to bring about crop improvement using CRISPR/Cas9 based genome editing tools and also presents studies where CRISPR/Cas9 has been used for enhancing biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. Application of these techniques will result in the development of non-genetically modified (Non-GMO) crops with the desired trait that can contribute to increased yield potential under biotic and abiotic stress conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 944 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 944 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 153 16%
Student > Bachelor 123 13%
Researcher 118 13%
Student > Master 115 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 4%
Other 104 11%
Unknown 293 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 309 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 216 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 1%
Chemistry 12 1%
Environmental Science 10 1%
Other 55 6%
Unknown 330 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,035,848
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#276
of 24,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,778
of 323,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#11
of 487 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 487 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.