You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are Survivors Different? Genetic-Based Selection of Trees by Mountain Pine Beetle During a Climate Change-Driven Outbreak in a High-Elevation Pine Forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.00993 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diana L. Six, Clare Vergobbi, Mitchell Cutter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 47% |
| Canada | 6 | 19% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 69% |
| Scientists | 10 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#681,472
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#160
of 24,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,408
of 343,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5
of 484 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 484 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.