↓ Skip to main content

Phenolic Profile and Susceptibility to Fusarium Infection of Pigmented Maize Cultivars

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenolic Profile and Susceptibility to Fusarium Infection of Pigmented Maize Cultivars
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.01189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jamila Bernardi, Lorenzo Stagnati, Luigi Lucini, Gabriele Rocchetti, Alessandra Lanubile, Carolina Cortellini, Giovanni De Poli, Matteo Busconi, Adriano Marocco

Abstract

Maize is a staple food source in the world, whose ancient varieties or landraces are receiving a growing attention. In this work, two Italian maize cultivars with pigmented kernels and one inbred line were investigated for untargeted phenolic profile, in vitro antioxidant capacity and resistance to Fusariumverticillioides infection. "Rostrato Rosso" was the richest in anthocyanins whilst phenolic acids were the second class in abundance, with comparable values detected between cultivars. Tyrosol equivalents were also the highest in "Rostrato Rosso" (822.4 mg kg-1). Coherently, "Rostrato Rosso" was highly resistant to fungal penetration and diffusion. These preliminary findings might help in breeding programs, aiming to develop maize lines more resistant to infections and with improved nutraceutical value.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Engineering 2 4%
Chemistry 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 25 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,359,953
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#8,067
of 20,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,972
of 331,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#221
of 470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,728 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.