You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Bioinformatics Pipeline for the Analysis and Target Prediction of RNA Effectors in Bidirectional Communication During Plant–Microbe Interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.01212 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvia Zanini, Ena Šečić, Lukas Jelonek, Karl-Heinz Kogel |
| Abstract |
Small RNA (sRNA) molecules are key factors in the communication between hosts and their interacting pathogens, where they function as effectors that can modulate both host defense and microbial virulence/pathogenicity through a mechanism termed cross-kingdom RNA interference (ck-RNAi). Consistent with this recent knowledge, sRNAs and their double-stranded RNA precursor have been adopted to control diseases in crop plants, demonstrating a straight forward application of the new findings to approach agricultural problems. Despite the great interest in natural ck-RNAi, it is astonishing to find just a few additional examples in the literature since the first report was published in 2013. One reason might be that the identification of sRNA effectors is hampered both by technical challenges and lack of routine bioinformatics application strategies. Here, we suggest a practical procedure to find, characterize, and validate sRNA effectors in plant-microbe interaction. The aim of this review is not to present and discuss all possible tools, but to give guidelines toward the best established software available for the analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,575,113
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,899
of 20,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,386
of 333,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#146
of 459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,728 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.