↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Geological and Environmental Events on the Diversity and Genetic Divergence of Four Closely Related Pines: Pinus koraiensis, P. armandii, P. griffithii, and P. pumila

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Geological and Environmental Events on the Diversity and Genetic Divergence of Four Closely Related Pines: Pinus koraiensis, P. armandii, P. griffithii, and P. pumila
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2018.01264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yun Jia, Juan Zhu, Ying Wu, Wei-Bing Fan, Gui-Fang Zhao, Zhong-Hu Li

Abstract

The effects of mountain uplift and environmental oscillations on nucleotide variability and species divergence remain largely unknown in East Asia. In this study, based on multiple nuclear DNA markers, we investigated the levels and patterns of nucleotide diversity and interspecific divergence in four closely related pines in China, i.e., Pinus koraiensis, P. armandii, P. griffithii, and P. pumila. The four pine taxa shared low levels of nucleotide polymorphisms at the species level. P. pumila had the highest silent nucleotide diversity (πsil = 0.00661) whereas P. griffithii had the lowest (πsil = 0.00175), while the levels of genetic polymorphism in P. armandii (πsil = 0.00508) and P. koraiensis (πsil = 0.00652) were intermediate between the other two species. Population genetic structure analysis showed that variations primarily existed within populations of the four pine species, presumably due to habitat fragmentation or the island-like distributions of Pinus species. Population divergence (FST) analysis showed that the genetic divergence between P. griffithii and P. koraiensis was much greater than that between P. koraiensis and the other two pines species. Isolation-with-migration analysis suggested that asymmetric gene flow had occurred between any two pairs of pine species. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that the four allied species split into two groups about 1.37 million years ago, where P. armandii and P. pumila were closer and clustered as sister species, whereas P. koraiensis and P. griffithii were clustered on another branch. Our results and those obtained in previous studies suggest that mountain uplift and geological climate oscillations may have led to the patterns of genetic divergence and nucleotide variations in these four pine species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 33%
Student > Master 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Energy 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2018.
All research outputs
#14,720,444
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#8,644
of 21,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,519
of 335,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#229
of 448 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 448 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.