You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Apomixis and Hybridization Drives Reticulate Evolution and Phyletic Differentiation in Sorbus L.: Implications for Conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.01796 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tracey J. Hamston, Natasha de Vere, R. Andrew King, Jaume Pellicer, Michael F. Fay, James E. Cresswell, Jamie R. Stevens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 23% |
| Researcher | 4 | 18% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 55% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,236,442
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,271
of 20,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,099
of 436,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#74
of 442 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,751 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 442 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.