You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understory Community Assembly Following Wildfire in Boreal Forests: Shift From Stochasticity to Competitive Exclusion and Environmental Filtering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2018.01854 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bo Liu, Han Y. H. Chen, Jian Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,248,133
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,285
of 20,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,400
of 437,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#76
of 442 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 442 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.