You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Methods to Assess in vivo Activity of Engineered Genome-Editing Nucleases in Protoplasts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2019.00110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satya Swathi Nadakuduti, Colby G. Starker, Dae Kwan Ko, Thilani B. Jayakody, C. Robin Buell, Daniel F. Voytas, David S. Douches |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 10% |
| Denmark | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 32 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,080,477
of 24,907,378 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,045
of 23,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,388
of 450,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#86
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,907,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,836 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.