You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Waterlogging-Induced Autophagy on Programmed Cell Death in Arabidopsis Roots
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2019.00468 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bin Guan, Ze Lin, Dongcheng Liu, Chengyang Li, Zhuqing Zhou, Fangzhu Mei, Jiwei Li, Xiangyi Deng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,074,577
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,243
of 20,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,187
of 353,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#150
of 392 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 392 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.