↓ Skip to main content

Automated Imaging, Tracking, and Analytics Pipeline for Differentiating Environmental Effects on Root Meristematic Cell Division

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automated Imaging, Tracking, and Analytics Pipeline for Differentiating Environmental Effects on Root Meristematic Cell Division
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.01487
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eli Buckner, Imani Madison, Hsuan Chou, Anna Matthiadis, Charles E. Melvin, Rosangela Sozzani, Cranos Williams, Terri A. Long

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 39%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 33%
Unspecified 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#12,846,790
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,146
of 20,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,189
of 457,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#164
of 430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.