You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Feed: Is There Any Difference From Food?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2019.01592 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paula A. Giraldo, Hiroshi Shinozuka, German C. Spangenberg, Noel O.I. Cogan, Kevin F. Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 64 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 12% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 69 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,489,753
of 24,626,543 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,372
of 23,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,088
of 469,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#110
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,626,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.