↓ Skip to main content

Do New Breeding Techniques in Ornamentals and Fruits Lead to Essentially Derived Varieties?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do New Breeding Techniques in Ornamentals and Fruits Lead to Essentially Derived Varieties?
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.01612
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edgar Krieger, Ellen De Keyser, Jan De Riek

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#18,716,467
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,200
of 20,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,454
of 361,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#391
of 492 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,942 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 492 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.