You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pores for Thought: Can Genetic Manipulation of Stomatal Density Protect Future Rice Yields?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2019.01783 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher R Buckley, Robert S Caine, Julie E Gray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 42% |
| Comoros | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,507,078
of 23,192,960 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,327
of 20,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,923
of 456,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#83
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,192,960 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,923 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.