You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of Multi-Image Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based High-Throughput Field Phenotyping of Canopy Temperature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2020.00150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gregor Perich, Andreas Hund, Jonas Anderegg, Lukas Roth, Martin P. Boer, Achim Walter, Frank Liebisch, Helge Aasen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 29% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,032,578
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,160
of 20,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,157
of 360,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#139
of 484 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,930 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 484 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.