You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Call for Participation: Collaborative Benchmarking of Functional-Structural Root Architecture Models. The Case of Root Water Uptake
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2020.00316 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Schnepf, Christopher K. Black, Valentin Couvreur, Benjamin M. Delory, Claude Doussan, Axelle Koch, Timo Koch, Mathieu Javaux, Magdalena Landl, Daniel Leitner, Guillaume Lobet, Trung Hieu Mai, Félicien Meunier, Lukas Petrich, Johannes A. Postma, Eckart Priesack, Volker Schmidt, Jan Vanderborght, Harry Vereecken, Matthias Weber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 62% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
| Researcher | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,403,695
of 25,349,035 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,023
of 24,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,628
of 376,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#35
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.