↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Assessment of Toxic Metals Bioaccumulation and the Mechanisms of Chromium (Cr) Tolerance and Uptake in Calotropis procera

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Assessment of Toxic Metals Bioaccumulation and the Mechanisms of Chromium (Cr) Tolerance and Uptake in Calotropis procera
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.00883
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamal Usman, Hareb Al Jabri, Mohammed H. Abu-Dieyeh, Mohammed H. S. A. Alsafran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Lecturer 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 21 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 25 74%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2020.
All research outputs
#18,072,774
of 23,223,705 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#12,398
of 20,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,971
of 399,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#442
of 566 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,223,705 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,975 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 566 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.