↓ Skip to main content

Cysteine and Methionine Biosynthetic Enzymes Have Distinct Effects on Seed Nutritional Quality and on Molecular Phenotypes Associated With Accumulation of a Methionine-Rich Seed Storage Protein in…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cysteine and Methionine Biosynthetic Enzymes Have Distinct Effects on Seed Nutritional Quality and on Molecular Phenotypes Associated With Accumulation of a Methionine-Rich Seed Storage Protein in Rice
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.01118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah J. Whitcomb, Apidet Rakpenthai, Franziska Brückner, Axel Fischer, Saroj Parmar, Alexander Erban, Joachim Kopka, Malcolm J. Hawkesford, Rainer Hoefgen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2020.
All research outputs
#18,078,691
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#12,408
of 20,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,879
of 399,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#411
of 540 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,996 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 540 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.