You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A New Method for Counting Reproductive Structures in Digitized Herbarium Specimens Using Mask R-CNN
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2020.01129 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles C. Davis, Julien Champ, Daniel S. Park, Ian Breckheimer, Goia M. Lyra, Junxi Xie, Alexis Joly, Dharmesh Tarapore, Aaron M. Ellison, Pierre Bonnet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 33% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2020.
All research outputs
#16,425,954
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#10,658
of 24,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,645
of 405,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#319
of 527 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 527 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.