You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrating Conventional and Participatory Crop Improvement for Smallholder Agriculture Using the Seeds for Needs Approach: A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2020.559515 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlo Fadda, Dejene K. Mengistu, Yosef G. Kidane, Matteo Dell’Acqua, Mario Enrico Pè, Jacob Van Etten |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 26% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#661,096
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#152
of 24,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,117
of 428,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#13
of 431 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,915 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 431 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.