You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: A Coordinated Suite of Wild-Introgression Lines in Indica and Japonica Elite Backgrounds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2020.640122 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Namrata Singh, Diane R. Wang, Liakat Ali, HyunJung Kim, Kazi M. Akther, Sandra E. Harrington, Ju-Won Kang, Ehsan Shakiba, Yuxin Shi, Genevieve DeClerck, Byron Meadows, Vishnu Govindaraj, Sang-Nag Ahn, Georgia C. Eizenga, Susan R. McCouch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#18,793,664
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,328
of 21,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,555
of 419,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#399
of 559 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 559 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.