You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Short-Read Sequence Aligners Indicates Strengths and Weaknesses for Biologists to Consider
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2021.657240 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan Musich, Lance Cadle-Davidson, Michael V. Osier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Sweden | 2 | 13% |
| Kenya | 1 | 6% |
| Thailand | 1 | 6% |
| Russia | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 14% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 75 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 58 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 83 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,692,341
of 25,397,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#566
of 24,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,797
of 437,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#17
of 565 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,397,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 565 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.