You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Root System Scale Models Significantly Overestimate Root Water Uptake at Drying Soil Conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2022.798741 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deepanshu Khare, Tobias Selzner, Daniel Leitner, Jan Vanderborght, Harry Vereecken, Andrea Schnepf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 50% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,058,490
of 23,365,820 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,142
of 21,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,351
of 522,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#120
of 1,105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,365,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,263 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.