↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptome analysis of Harumi tangor fruits: Insights into interstock-mediated fruit quality

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcriptome analysis of Harumi tangor fruits: Insights into interstock-mediated fruit quality
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2022.995913
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ling Liao, Yunjie Li, Xiaoyi Bi, Bo Xiong, Xun Wang, Honghong Deng, Mingfei Zhang, Guochao Sun, Zhenghua Jin, Zehao Huang, Zhihui Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#15,493,741
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#11,034
of 20,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,437
of 438,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#694
of 1,494 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,556 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,494 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.