↓ Skip to main content

Repeated mechanical damage enhanced Aquilaria sinensis resistance to Heortia vitessoides through jasmonic acid

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repeated mechanical damage enhanced Aquilaria sinensis resistance to Heortia vitessoides through jasmonic acid
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1183002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yingying Chen, Shenghua Liang, Shuyao Wang, Baocai Li, Kun Wang, Yongjin Zhu, Risheng Yang, Xin Hao, Zhuoying Yang, Yingbai Shen, Rihong Jiang, Kaixiang Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#19,791,176
of 24,321,976 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15,621
of 22,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,601
of 219,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#257
of 584 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,321,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,864 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 584 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.