↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Transcriptomic insights into root development and overwintering transcriptional memory of Brassica rapa L. grown in the field

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Transcriptomic insights into root development and overwintering transcriptional memory of Brassica rapa L. grown in the field
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1195912
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lijun Liu, Yuanyuan Pu, Zaoxia Niu, Junyan Wu, Yan Fang, Jun Xu, Fang Xu, Jinli Yue, Li Ma, Xuecai Li, Wancang Sun

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#16,416,944
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,810
of 24,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,299
of 425,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#366
of 952 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,965 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 952 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.