↓ Skip to main content

Differences in functional niche hypervolume among four types of forest vegetation and their environmental determinants across various climatic regions in China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in functional niche hypervolume among four types of forest vegetation and their environmental determinants across various climatic regions in China
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1243209
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jihong Huang, Ruoyun Yu, Runguo Zang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#19,579,009
of 24,938,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,010
of 23,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,833
of 167,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#143
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,938,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,858 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.