↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Metabolic engineering of valuable compounds in photosynthetic organisms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Metabolic engineering of valuable compounds in photosynthetic organisms
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1260454
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhi-Yan Du, Wajid Waheed Bhat, Guoyin Kai, Inna Khozin-Goldberg, Xiao-Hong Yu, Agnieszka Zienkiewicz, Krzysztof Zienkiewicz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2023.
All research outputs
#19,902,159
of 24,457,696 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15,726
of 23,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,020
of 202,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#229
of 563 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,457,696 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 563 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.