↓ Skip to main content

Simple cryopreservation protocol for Luffa pollen: enhancing breeding efficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simple cryopreservation protocol for Luffa pollen: enhancing breeding efficiency
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1268726
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arvind Nagar, Ravi Gowthami, Amish Kumar Sureja, Anilabha Das Munshi, Manjusha Verma, Awani Kumar Singh, Niharika Mallick, Jogendra Singh, Subhash Chander, Muthusamy Shankar, Pooja Pathania, Subramani Rajkumar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2023.
All research outputs
#20,096,153
of 24,703,227 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15,954
of 23,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,400
of 171,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#195
of 488 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,703,227 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 488 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.