↓ Skip to main content

Effect of continuous planting on Casuarina equisetifolia rhizosphere soil physicochemical indexes, microbial functional diversity and metabolites

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of continuous planting on Casuarina equisetifolia rhizosphere soil physicochemical indexes, microbial functional diversity and metabolites
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1288444
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuhua Wang, Jianjuan Li, Mingzhe Li, Xiaoli Jia, Yuhong Cai, Mingyue Hu, Qingxu Zhang, Pengyuan Cheng, Shaoxiong Lin, Wenxiong Lin, Haibin Wang, Zeyan Wu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#20,353,691
of 25,016,456 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16,229
of 23,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,494
of 193,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#193
of 449 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,016,456 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,983 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 449 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.