You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Image-based classification of wheat spikes by glume pubescence using convolutional neural networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2023.1336192 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nikita V. Artemenko, Mikhail A. Genaev, Rostislav UI. Epifanov, Evgeny G. Komyshev, Yulia V. Kruchinina, Vasiliy S. Koval, Nikolay P. Goncharov, Dmitry A. Afonnikov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,477,756
of 25,168,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#16,287
of 24,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,920
of 178,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#170
of 364 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,168,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,167 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 364 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.