↓ Skip to main content

Salvia guidongensis sp. nov.: unraveling a critical evolutionary link in East Asian Salvia from Central China integrating morphology, phylogeny, and plastid genomics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Salvia guidongensis sp. nov.: unraveling a critical evolutionary link in East Asian Salvia from Central China integrating morphology, phylogeny, and plastid genomics
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2024.1332443
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan-Bo Huang, Zhe-Chen Qi, Jie-Ying Feng, Bin-Jie Ge, Cun-Zhong Huang, Yu-Qing Feng, Jing Wu, Pu-Rui Wei, Takuro Ito, Goro Kokubugata, Pan Li, Yu-Kun Wei

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#22,804,735
of 25,424,630 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#19,755
of 24,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,067
of 152,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#282
of 365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,424,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,657 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.