↓ Skip to main content

Towards a practical threat assessment methodology for crop landraces

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards a practical threat assessment methodology for crop landraces
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2024.1336876
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria João Almeida, Ana Maria Barata, Stef De Haan, Bal Krishna Joshi, Joana Magos Brehm, Mariana Yazbek, Nigel Maxted

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,397,790
of 25,464,544 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,696
of 24,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,196
of 213,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#8
of 562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,464,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,709 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.